Author: Kim Hvarre
Date: 04:10:35 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 1997 at 01:58:03, Ernst Walet wrote: >On December 26, 1997 at 21:11:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>>>The *effect* is counter-revolutionary, while the *intent* was greater >>>>knowledge. >>>> >>>>You guys argue to shoot Sandro Nechi. Instead you should be applauding >>>>him. >>> >>>Depends of ones evaluation relative "the Stalin dictum"? >>> >>>>Chris Whittington >>> >>> >>>kim >> >>Brilliant group here. >>Some are interested in relating anything to Hitler and Nazi, >>others quote Stalin's dictum... >> >>Why for heavens sake is it important to use these guys always and always >>as a vehicle to show big contrast. Isn't it possible to post a point of >>view withot quoting the biggest criminals of the universe ? >> >>And all this in a computer-chess-group ? And this nearly one day after >>christmas. Heavens. This is really shocking ! >>But ok - if you really need it...(maybe to get your kicks) :-( >> >>Could you please do this in email ? >>I am not interested in what criminals have said or how they behaved or >>whatever. I can live without quoting them and I can live without >>misusing their words in almost any sentence. >> >>The world has some nice point of views. Why is there a need to see >>anything from the weakest point of view ?! :-( >>Thanks. > > >Couldn't have said it better! Ernst. ...and that's why I refered to Chris' original "contribution" - irony, but only with a sad smile. HNY kim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.