Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view)

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 08:40:27 10/17/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 17, 2000 at 10:58:59, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On October 17, 2000 at 10:56:49, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>Deep Fritz is not silly.
>>It predicted the move of kasparov 14...b6 correctly
>
>That's correct. Gandalf could only predict Shipov :o).
>
>Mogens.

b6 is shit ! so good prediction :-)))

[Event "world-chess-championship"]
[Site "London"]
[Date "17/10/2000"]
[Round "6"]
[White "Kramnik"]
[Black "Kasparov"]
[Result "*"]
[Opening "D27 QGA: Classical, Rubinstein Variation"]

1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 e6 4.e3 c5 5.Bxc4 a6 6.O-O Nf6 7.a4 Nc6 8.Qe2 cxd4 9.Rd1
Be7 10.exd4
O-O 11.Nc3 Nd5 12.Bb3 Re8 13.h4 Ncb4 14.h5 b6 15.Ne5 Bb7 16.a5 b5 *



gambit tiger says a5 was shit. h6 would have been right.

now gambit tiger likes blacks position.
but small value. 0.22.

of course deep junior says 0.00 ! What else could a bean-counter
program evaluate :-))) fritz also always says 0.00 .
that means: i have no idea what is going on here ...

after b5 it will now play h6 again



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.