Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:49:52 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 11:40:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 17, 2000 at 10:58:59, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On October 17, 2000 at 10:56:49, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>Deep Fritz is not silly. >>>It predicted the move of kasparov 14...b6 correctly >> >>That's correct. Gandalf could only predict Shipov :o). >> >>Mogens. > >b6 is shit ! so good prediction :-))) I do not know if b6 is a bad or a good move but saying silly about predicting kasparov's move is not correct because kasparov is not silly. > >[Event "world-chess-championship"] >[Site "London"] >[Date "17/10/2000"] >[Round "6"] >[White "Kramnik"] >[Black "Kasparov"] >[Result "*"] >[Opening "D27 QGA: Classical, Rubinstein Variation"] > >1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 e6 4.e3 c5 5.Bxc4 a6 6.O-O Nf6 7.a4 Nc6 8.Qe2 cxd4 9.Rd1 >Be7 10.exd4 >O-O 11.Nc3 Nd5 12.Bb3 Re8 13.h4 Ncb4 14.h5 b6 15.Ne5 Bb7 16.a5 b5 * > > > >gambit tiger says a5 was shit. h6 would have been right. > >now gambit tiger likes blacks position. >but small value. 0.22. > >of course deep junior says 0.00 ! What else could a bean-counter >program evaluate :-))) This is not Amir's opinion about Junior. See http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?133387 fritz also always says 0.00 . >that means: i have no idea what is going on here ... You cannot decide that it has no idea only because the evaluation is 0.00 The only way to check is to play with Fritz against other programs from the relevant positions. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.