Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: 6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view)

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 08:56:40 10/17/00

On October 17, 2000 at 11:40:27, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>b6 is shit ! so good prediction :-)))

:o))

>[Event "world-chess-championship"]
>[Site "London"]
>[Date "17/10/2000"]
>[Round "6"]
>[White "Kramnik"]
>[Black "Kasparov"]
>[Result "*"]
>[Opening "D27 QGA: Classical, Rubinstein Variation"]
>
>1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.Nf3 e6 4.e3 c5 5.Bxc4 a6 6.O-O Nf6 7.a4 Nc6 8.Qe2 cxd4 9.Rd1
>Be7 10.exd4
>O-O 11.Nc3 Nd5 12.Bb3 Re8 13.h4 Ncb4 14.h5 b6 15.Ne5 Bb7 16.a5 b5 *
>
>
>
>gambit tiger says a5 was shit. h6 would have been right.

Gandalf wanted to play that move for a long time now.

>now gambit tiger likes blacks position.
>but small value. 0.22.

Gandalf wants to play 18.. Rc8 for some reason. Quite optimistic on behalf of
black, 0.46/10.

Mogens.

Re: 6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view) Enrique Irazoqui 09:11:16 10/17/00
- Re: 6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view) Thorsten Czub 09:23:42 10/17/00
  - Re: 6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view) Mogens Larsen 09:34:58 10/17/00
  - changed to 19.Qf3 +0.32 (NT) Thorsten Czub 09:29:18 10/17/00
    - After 20.Ra3 Enrique Irazoqui 09:41:47 10/17/00
      - Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Thorsten Czub 09:44:53 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Enrique Irazoqui 09:53:55 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Thorsten Czub 09:56:15 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Mogens Larsen 10:10:53 10/17/00
        
        After 22.Ncd7 Enrique Irazoqui 10:13:13 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 Chessfun 10:20:36 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 Enrique Irazoqui 10:23:53 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 Chessfun 10:26:05 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 Enrique Irazoqui 10:29:26 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 Chessfun 10:31:51 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 32....e5 Enrique Irazoqui 10:44:54 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 39. Thorsten Czub 10:54:55 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 32....e5 Chessfun 10:48:53 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 32....e5 Chessfun 10:51:13 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 32....e5 Chessfun 10:54:36 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 41... Re6 Enrique Irazoqui 11:01:29 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 41... Re6 Chessfun 11:04:12 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 41... Re6 Chessfun 11:13:41 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 41... Re6 Enrique Irazoqui 11:11:37 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 41... Re6 Mogens Larsen 11:21:08 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 41... Re6 Uri Blass 11:24:07 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 32....e5 Enrique Irazoqui 10:54:28 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 pavel 10:37:17 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Ncd7 Enrique Irazoqui 10:34:36 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Uri Blass 10:00:40 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Enrique Irazoqui 09:59:18 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 20.Ra3 0.00 again ?!? Chessfun 10:18:46 10/17/00
        
        6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view) Thorsten Czub 10:16:21 10/17/00
        
        After 22.Rad8 Enrique Irazoqui 10:20:12 10/17/00
        
        Re: After 22.Rad8 Mogens Larsen 10:21:48 10/17/00
    - Re: changed to 19.Qf3 +0.32 (NT) Enrique Irazoqui 09:31:21 10/17/00
  - Re: 6 Kramnik - Kasparov (gambit-tigers point of view) Enrique Irazoqui 09:25:22 10/17/00

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.