Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 06:32:57 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 1997 at 21:11:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>The *effect* is counter-revolutionary, while the *intent* was greater >>>knowledge. >>> >>>You guys argue to shoot Sandro Nechi. Instead you should be applauding >>>him. >> >>Depends of ones evaluation relative "the Stalin dictum"? >> >>>Chris Whittington >> >> >>kim > >Brilliant group here. >Some are interested in relating anything to Hitler and Nazi, >others quote Stalin's dictum... > >Why for heavens sake is it important to use these guys always and always >as a vehicle to show big contrast. Isn't it possible to post a point of >view withot quoting the biggest criminals of the universe ? > >And all this in a computer-chess-group ? And this nearly one day after >christmas. Heavens. This is really shocking ! 1. I've just rejected to you your latest email group nonsense on the grounds that it contains 10 zillion tonnes of political ranting. So speak for yourself on politics. 2. Since you have a tendency to highly authoritarian conclusions, based on the usual politcal theories, on just about anything and everything, I thought I'ld illustrate by analogy the morality of your latest political excursion into the correctness or otherwise of the data contained in opening books, and the subsequent blackening of the creators behind these books. >But ok - if you really need it...(maybe to get your kicks) :-( > >Could you please do this in email ? No. I've had enough of these stupid emails in forums designed to reach specific conclusions by the hand picking of the original members. Or email group cooking as it has become known. A more serious problem than book cooking IMO. >I am not interested in what criminals have said or how they behaved or >whatever. Oh yes you are. But not when used against you. >I can live without quoting them and I can live without >misusing their words in almost any sentence. Your posting history suggests otherwise. Chris Whittington > >The world has some nice point of views. Why is there a need to see >anything from the weakest point of view ?! :-( >Thanks.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.