Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 08:47:55 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
>1. I've just rejected to you your latest email group nonsense on the >grounds that it contains 10 zillion tonnes of political ranting. So >speak for yourself on politics. What I do in my private and in emails, and what you do in public here are two shoes. Learn to differenciate. Than life would be easier for you. >2. Since you have a tendency to highly authoritarian conclusions, based >on the usual politcal theories, on just about anything and everything, I >thought I'ld illustrate by analogy the morality of your latest political >excursion into the correctness or otherwise of the data contained in >opening books, and the subsequent blackening of the creators behind >these books. This does not interest me. I am not willing to discuss politics with you. I am interested in computerchess. >No. I've had enough of these stupid emails in forums designed to reach >specific conclusions by the hand picking of the original members. Or >email group cooking as it has become known. A more serious problem than >book cooking IMO. Right. But it does not make much sense to fight this problem HERE ! >>I am not interested in what criminals have said or how they behaved or >>whatever. > >Oh yes you are. But not when used against you. This is wrong and I don't want to hear this again. I am NOT interested in criminals.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.