Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 10:08:04 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 1997 at 11:47:55, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>1. I've just rejected to you your latest email group nonsense on the >>grounds that it contains 10 zillion tonnes of political ranting. So >>speak for yourself on politics. > >What I do in my private and in emails, and what you do in public here >are two shoes. >Learn to differenciate. Than life would be easier for you. > > >>2. Since you have a tendency to highly authoritarian conclusions, based >>on the usual politcal theories, on just about anything and everything, I >>thought I'ld illustrate by analogy the morality of your latest political >>excursion into the correctness or otherwise of the data contained in >>opening books, and the subsequent blackening of the creators behind >>these books. > >This does not interest me. I am not willing to discuss politics with >you. >I am interested in computerchess. > >>No. I've had enough of these stupid emails in forums designed to reach >>specific conclusions by the hand picking of the original members. Or >>email group cooking as it has become known. A more serious problem than >>book cooking IMO. > >Right. But it does not make much sense to fight this problem HERE ! Where else ? The group to create this CCC board was cooked. The americans didn't stand a cats chance in hell with any of their arguments - outvoted every time. And who built the original group ? Hmmm, Thorsten ? Not a more serious problem than book cooking ? Chris Whittington > > >>>I am not interested in what criminals have said or how they behaved or >>>whatever. >> >>Oh yes you are. But not when used against you. > >This is wrong and I don't want to hear this again. >I am NOT interested in criminals.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.