Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 10:15:56 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 1997 at 11:31:46, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>So morality resides in the opening book ? We have politically correct >>opening books now ? Presumably ECO only is politically correct and >>additions to the book bring in active/passive/cooking/long >>lines/autoplayer/cptr-cptr and these introduce political incorrectness ? > >Your sarcasm is placed wrongly. I think not. >I differenciate between lines the program learns itself and lines it has >learned in autoplayer-games against the enemy's. No difference. Auto-learning before or after release. Its just more Ai added to the program. But for some its not correct. >I am not speaking about politics. Oh yes you are. You state that book learning is *morally* unacceptable when defined as cooking. Thats a very political statement, the more so because it targets specific individuals, Sandro, Peter and Marty. >I am not talking about this sarcastic stuff you do. No. You are more blunt, and seek to wrap up your attacks in 'facts' and 'data' and cooked email groups. >I am talking about computer-chess. No. You talk politics. Chess is just the vehicle. Be honest about it. >It seems you are not anymore able to >do so. >Maybe you should switch into politics or try another job, a priest would >be a good job for you ! :-) Ta very much. > > >> >>Data with politics. Shall we submit our opening books to the >>Czub-committee in future for acceptance or rejection ? You can make a >>whole new email group with politically acceptable members for >>pre-determination of the outcome ...... > > >Right. Is this your contribution to the discussion ? Aha. >If that is all you have to say about opening-books, than it is not much. But you bring morality into opening book data. Is nobody allowed to argue over this ? Chris Whittington
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.