Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 17:53:45 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 14:25:32, Chessfun wrote: >On October 17, 2000 at 14:23:38, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 17, 2000 at 14:22:19, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 17, 2000 at 14:19:56, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On October 17, 2000 at 14:17:46, Chessfun wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>>Rd7+ Re7 Qb3+ Kf8 Rd6 Nxe5 Qc3 b4 >>>>>depth 11 +3.18 >>>> >>>>WHAT??? No way (I hope). >>>> >>>>Kramnik,V - Kasparov,G >>>>8/5k1p/p1nRrp1P/PpP2qp1/4p3/4B3/1P3PP1/3Q2K1 w - - 0 1 >>>> >>>>Analysis by Deep Fritz T28: >>>> >>>>43.Rd7+ Kg6 44.Rg7+ Kxh6 45.Qd7 Re5 46.Rxh7+ Qxh7 47.Qxc6 Kg6 >>>> ² (0.44) Depth: 11/28 00:00:50 6786kN >>>> ² (0.50) Depth: 12/32 00:01:55 15933kN >>>> >>>>(Irazoqui, Cadaqués 17.10.2000) >>> >>>Still showing >>>Rd7+ Re7 Qb3+ kf8 Rd6 Nxa5 Qc3 b4 Qxf6+ etc >>> >>>Depth 13. +2.84 >>> >>>I'll check after Rd7+ Kg6 >>> >>>Sarah. >> >>Added score. > >if Kg6 >Rg7+ Kxh6 Rc7 Qe5 QD7 Ne7 g4 Kg7 Bd4 Qxe6 Qxc7 Bxf6+ Kf8 >+3.88 Depth 12 > >Sarah. That eval is too big. IE this is another example. I don't recall this exact position but white is either up 1 or 2 pawns (2 I think) but with lots of holes and a queen and knight to deal with. Most programs had this as +1 to +1.3 in this stage of the game. I became less and less optimistic for white as I watched, as the queen is simply a real pain, and the knight is the optimal piece to have working with the queen in a board with pawns moved everywhere. I wasn't surprised by the outcome, particularly. If programs say +2 or less, draws don't cause any speculation or bug-hunting... I think the krnp vs kr might have been easier to win than this game was. Of course, taking time to eat the a-pawn in this game might have cost white more than he thought...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.