Author: Chessfun
Date: 18:42:25 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 20:53:45, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 17, 2000 at 14:25:32, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 17, 2000 at 14:23:38, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 17, 2000 at 14:22:19, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On October 17, 2000 at 14:19:56, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 17, 2000 at 14:17:46, Chessfun wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>Rd7+ Re7 Qb3+ Kf8 Rd6 Nxe5 Qc3 b4 >>>>>>depth 11 +3.18 >>>>> >>>>>WHAT??? No way (I hope). >>>>> >>>>>Kramnik,V - Kasparov,G >>>>>8/5k1p/p1nRrp1P/PpP2qp1/4p3/4B3/1P3PP1/3Q2K1 w - - 0 1 >>>>> >>>>>Analysis by Deep Fritz T28: >>>>> >>>>>43.Rd7+ Kg6 44.Rg7+ Kxh6 45.Qd7 Re5 46.Rxh7+ Qxh7 47.Qxc6 Kg6 >>>>> ² (0.44) Depth: 11/28 00:00:50 6786kN >>>>> ² (0.50) Depth: 12/32 00:01:55 15933kN >>>>> >>>>>(Irazoqui, Cadaqués 17.10.2000) >>>> >>>>Still showing >>>>Rd7+ Re7 Qb3+ kf8 Rd6 Nxa5 Qc3 b4 Qxf6+ etc >>>> >>>>Depth 13. +2.84 >>>> >>>>I'll check after Rd7+ Kg6 >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>Added score. >> >>if Kg6 >>Rg7+ Kxh6 Rc7 Qe5 QD7 Ne7 g4 Kg7 Bd4 Qxe6 Qxc7 Bxf6+ Kf8 >>+3.88 Depth 12 >> >>Sarah. > > >That eval is too big. IE this is another example. I don't recall this >exact position but white is either up 1 or 2 pawns (2 I think) but with >lots of holes and a queen and knight to deal with. This score was posted after both Enrique's and Uri's questioned what would Gambit reply to Kg6. The depth at this point is only 12 and was still changing as I typed, however it saw what other programs did not see at that point. Kramnik then played Qh5+......I sent him a quick email of Gambit's eval then he went back so as to play Rd7+ :-) >Most programs had this as +1 to +1.3 in this stage of the game. I became >less and less optimistic for white as I watched, as the queen is simply a real >pain, and the knight is the optimal piece to have working with the queen in a >board with pawns moved everywhere. From what I saw, most programs did not see what was coming, at least judging by the kibitz's on ICC. >I wasn't surprised by the outcome, particularly. If programs say +2 or less, >draws don't cause any speculation or bug-hunting... I will make you a wager. Gambit 1.0 will beat any program at the time controls left which was roughly 60 mins each side. >I think the krnp vs kr might have been easier to win than this game was. Of >course, taking time to eat the a-pawn in this game might have cost white more >than he thought... In Gambit's opinion many of the moves played by white after Rd7+ were inferior. I happen to agree. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.