Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 19:54:30 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
That's a very fair argument, except for the fact that I haven't made any conclusions about the program itself, nor implied that the results are fake or bogus. So why the defensive attitude? I've merely concentrated on two simple issues: features of the package and behaviour exhibited by some of the beta testers. Instead of entering into a dialogue and adressing criticism, he chose to attack my person. I don't really care, but hardly a role model for good behaviour. On the first issue CT refrained from making any comments until I critisized the behaviour and information related by his team members. He didn't contribute any relevant information whatsoever, only incorrect accusations was offered regarding my motives. You can check the thread yourself if you don't believe me. The issue of mortgage and food on the table is especially touching. In the second instance another Rebel team member insulted most of the other programmers on the basis of very little fact, if any at all. When the expected response came, CT jumped in on his behalf instead of being objective. Same situation as before. Exactly the same goes for this thread. So CT is indirectly responsible for insults made by TC, because he defended the results of that behaviour. That's how I see it anyway. Mogens. PS: Btw, if you have time, would you be interested in an e-mail game?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.