Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 23:09:22 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 01:35:09, Mogens Larsen wrote:
>On October 18, 2000 at 01:01:15, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>I just wanted to be kind with you. You love to be attacked, so you can play the
>>victim.
>>
>>That's what trolling is all about.
>>
>>That's how you think you are going to get some attention and importance.
>>
>>Come on, if I did not attack you, you would have been very disappointed, I'm
>>sure.
>
>The only one behaving like a victim is you. From the beginning until now. First
>you were agressive, then I was supposed to have pity with you and your hungry
>children and now simplistic derogatory remarks. I wonder what the next attempt
>will be.
I'm not agressive against you.
Sorry if you think so.
You come on CCC and have a great fun involving yourself into controversy. OK,
fine with me.
How can I be agressive against you? At least you should not be affected, isn't
it?
Of course you are not.
>>What should I have said, in order to be objective in your eyes?
>
>Just check the word objectivity in a dictionary. I hear that Webster is
>especially well-suited.
So what should I have said?
I cannot guess what would please you in this case. Just tell me.
>>Tell me. I see that you are extremely affected by a quarrel in which you are
>>absolutely not involved, it's not fair.
>
>Hahaha.. good one.
Sorry, I did not want to hurt you.
>>On this message board, I have recently posted a message where I was actually
>>defending Frans and Amir, and I was explaining why I think they are very good
>>chess programmers.
>
>That's very generous of you. And it's not even Christmas yet.
It's not about being generous. It's about being "objective".
Somebody told me about a good dictionnary recently. You should check this word
by yourself.
OK, forget about it. I myself have found this advice stupid.
>>There are actually two messages of mine like this in the recent past.
>>
>>Are you going to be able to find these messages and quote them?
>
>Probably, but quoting something that's already been written once seem like a
>waste of time. Especially if they're uncharacteristic of recent behaviour.
Oops... I see you did not read them. Or else you could quote them.
Too bad. Mogens is not interested in positive messages. Mogens looks for
controversy and throws fuel on the fire.
CCC is the right place for Mogens.
You'll have a lot of fun.
Can I help you? If you want to put the knife exactly where it hurts, I think you
can find great stuffs in the archives. It will take you some time and efforts
(but I'm sure you are ready to make the investment), and you can certainly find
old debates, ugly disputes. By inserting explicit or implicit references to
these events in the right threads, you can very easily upset the right persons
and make a lot of damages.
Anyway... I think you are talented enough to create new disputes by yourself.
All this work is maybe not needed after all.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.