Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 01:26:06 10/18/00

Go up one level in this thread

On October 18, 2000 at 04:06:57, Uri Blass wrote:
>I expect programs to have better evaluation function than humans.
>It was done in backgammon.
>The problem in chess is more comlicated but I guess that it can be done also in
>chess.
>
>Uri

THe "evaluation-function" of humans is ok,
it is the search that needs some more nullmove and brute-force :-))

• Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger Uri Blass 02:06:27 10/18/00
  • Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger Thorsten Czub 02:28:05 10/18/00
    • Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger Mike Adams 03:23:58 10/18/00
• Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger José Carlos 01:44:51 10/18/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.