Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 02:06:27 10/18/00

Go up one level in this thread

On October 18, 2000 at 04:26:06, Thorsten Czub wrote:

>On October 18, 2000 at 04:06:57, Uri Blass wrote:
>>I expect programs to have better evaluation function than humans.
>>It was done in backgammon.
>>The problem in chess is more comlicated but I guess that it can be done also in
>>chess.
>>
>>Uri
>
>THe "evaluation-function" of humans is ok,
>it is the search that needs some more nullmove and brute-force :-))

I disagree.
Kasparov defended the position like a good bean counter.

I believe that kasparov played g5 because his evaluation of the position was
wrong.
I believe that g5 is losing but I am not sure about it(the only clear thing is
that white has a clear advantage after g5).

Uri

• Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger Thorsten Czub 02:28:05 10/18/00
  • Re: Humans are more similiar to the bean counters than to gambittiger Mike Adams 03:23:58 10/18/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.