Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:51:55 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 05:33:06, Thorsten Czub wrote: >:-))) > >don´t get a heart-attache steen. I am sure they will get it right. > >sooner or later. or maybe later... > >maybe next year. :-))) the most important thing is of course that the chessbase >programs run accurate :-)) My opinion is that it should be the responsibility of the testers to stop the match when they suspect that the learning of a program that is supposed to have a learning function is destroyed and to ask the programmer for the reason for it. It is not interesting to continue matches when you see that the learning is destoyed and if it is possible to test the program without this bug then it is better to do it. I do not suggest to stop matches after seeing bugs that are not learning bugs because this kind of bug is different. People may complain that tiger12 also lost the same opening against Junior many times in a row but this case was different because I understood that the reason was not a bug but a bad design decision. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.