Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:26:34 12/27/97
Go up one level in this thread
>Its an Animal Farm argument. Based on some supposed false morality. > >Persoanlly, I look beyond it, to just what is is that is causing certain >individuals (and its the same ones as last time) to be attacking Mchess >and its programming team. > >Chris Whittington I resign. You WANT to misunderstand it and you WANT to take it as an attack against Mchess. I would also have something against it if Rebel9 or Hiarcs6 would do it. It is nothing personal. If you don't want to see the thing, the difference, than let it. When your child Arabelle gets good remarks in school and the teacher finds out that the got good remarks because she had the work 2 weeks ago, and learned it by heart, I am sure the teacher will not like it and redo the whole work/test again as long as FAIR conditions (nobody knows the results of the test in forward) have been realized. If you want to make a personal thing out of it the way: I hate Arabella or teacher hates Arabella than you did not understand anything. It has nothing to do with politics what Arabella has done. But repeat your point of view as often as you want. I don't like people who know the answer of a test in forward because they got the questions one month before and I will not like them in future. Success is quantity. And having success in a test with "cheating" is not the success I want to accept for myself. Others can do whatever they want. But I am allowed to comment on it. Thats my point of view.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.