Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 09:07:31 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 11:48:59, Mogens Larsen wrote: >Of course everything is interpretation, but there are correct interpretations >and there are wrong interpretations. In this case your interpretation >contradicts the factual basis on which the data is created. To be precise. You >can't invent a interpretation when you know it contradicts the abilities of the >subject itself. Human beings can't fly, jumping from a tall building >interpreting your arms as wings won't help. Nonsense. You have no facts and no data and make big words, insulting people, and request for strange words like : objectivity, interpretation, facts, precise, accuracy... Sounds like a figue out of the 16th century. looks like a monty-python-person. Very nice mogens. And funny indeed ! >The principal variation of a knowledge based program isn't a plan. It's a >calculation like the one performed by "bean counters". Only difference is the >addition or altering of specific variables and parameters. Nothing more and >nothing less. The moves might appear more sensible and intelligent, because the >choice of move is based on more information. That doesn't mean planning at all, >just a more educated guess. The programmer stipulate preferred values by adding >parameters. The program just calculates accordingly. this is not true. a plan is when i use an idea over the whole game. no plan is when i count, calculate and do all the nice things you wrote down. A plan comes from having the will to do something. from a need. and in the moment the SCORE stresses the ideas that strong that the behaviour gets penetrant, its not anymore calculation (of course planning is also a form of calculation). >In fact you could argue that longterm plans demands accuracy, not speculative >evaluation. Speculative evaluation could be defined as the destroyer of "plans". nonsense. accuracy ! again ! you really seem to have a tick with mechanistic cartesianic vocabulary. >Does this mean that "bean counters" are constructing plans through accuracy? No, >it doesn't. There are no specific goals or intentions to reached by planning, >only calculation. in bean counter programs. yes. >You're probably right. Those without knowledge seek it. Happy hunting THORsten. oh - you would be surprised to see how big my trophy-room is and which animals i have collected. of course i cannot compete with YOUR knowledge and YOUR genius accuracy and perfect objective falsification of the untruth, that is 100% based on facts and calculations in your objective mind ... who can compete against a god ? >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.