Author: Mike S.
Date: 11:09:00 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
This kind of problem could have been avoided since the start of the list, if they would have done it like this (like I wrote once or twice here too): 1. switch off all (permanent) learning 2. remove all doubles (!!) from the results By this, they would test "out of the box" versions. What's the use of testing software with (an increasing mass of) individual learning data, which any other user *does not have*? Sooner or later, they are testing something completely different from the software one can buy. But they *just won't do it*. Chaos continues. Regards, M.Scheidl
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.