Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 11:11:03 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 14:07:24, Ricardo Gibert wrote: >My conclusion from your list is the PGN standard is poorly designed. It lacks >flexibility and makes outright bad decisions. It is obvious that some of the >reasons for the variations are that there are *good* reasons to vary. I'm not sure what you mean by this. What is a good example of a reason to vary some of these things?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.