Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:40:12 10/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 14:37:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 18, 2000 at 13:31:23, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 18, 2000 at 10:21:54, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>>I will make you a wager. >>>>Gambit 1.0 will beat any program at the time controls left which >>>>was roughly 60 mins each side. >>> >>> >>>Better check enrique's post. You lose before you start. >> >>I did as well as some home analysis myself. >>There are a few ways black slips away with best play. >>So the wager was a rash offer in hindsight. >> >>Sarah. > >Here is my take on computer evaluations: I expect crafty to win all games >against a GM if the score is (say) 1.5 or higher, and crafty has no more than >a 1 pawn advantage. That is 1 pawn + a lot of positional edges. I would >expect to draw positions where the score is 1.5 and crafty has two or three >pawns. The opponent has a lot of positional compensation. > >scores like +2 where it is 2 pawns ahead are hard to measure and could end >up as wins or draws. I would tend to agree with that. It is in fact what I meant just now in the reply to Enrique's post, without going into specific scores. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.