Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: King, rook pawn and wrong bishop endgames

Author: Ricardo Gibert

Date: 13:31:54 10/18/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 2000 at 15:57:10, Uri Blass wrote:

>On October 18, 2000 at 15:52:09, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>
>>On October 18, 2000 at 14:14:20, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>On October 18, 2000 at 12:34:42, Ricardo Gibert wrote:
>>>
>>><snipped>
>>>>The algorithm to determine whether this type of position is drawn is quite
>>>>simple. With the h-pawn, Black draws if the K can get into the four corner
>>>>squares g7,g8,h7,h8. Otherwise, the outcome is not assured. Note, it is not
>>>>enough for the King to get in front of the pawn as the following position
>>>>illustrates:
>>>
>>>I can give another rule:
>>>Blacks draw if it is black to move and the distance between the black king and
>>>the corner in king moves is smaller than the ditance between the corner and the
>>>white pieces except the bishop(white king in king moves and white pawn in pawn
>>>moves)
>>>
>>>If it is white to move then use distance-1 instead of distance for white.
>>>
>>>Uri
>>
>>I like your rule. It's interesting, but it needs to be amended somewhat:
>>
>>[D]4B3/8/8/8/8/2k5/7P/K7 b - - 0 0
>
>This position is not a draw by my rule.
>The distance of the white pawn to the corner in pawn moves is equal(and not
>smaller) to the distance of the black king to the corner in king moves.

Yep, I goofed.

>
>>
>>as you can see, your rule is a little dangerous. There may be other examples,
>>but this is what I came up with in a about a minute. Still your rule is
>>promising.
>>
>>There are some positions your rule does not give as drawn, but "my" rule does.
>>The reverse is also true of course, so maybe the rules should be combined?
>
>I agree that the rules can be combined.
>
>Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.