Author: Jeroen Noomen
Date: 08:49:41 12/28/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 27, 1997 at 05:39:21, Thorsten Czub wrote: Thorsten, I completely agree with you on this subject. I cannot see why people try to defend 40-moves opening lines ending with +4 and an easy win. This is disgusting and not in the interest of CUSTOMERS who want to buy a chess program. Regards, Jeroen >>I think you misunderstand what we wrote. Of course the learner-option > >Right. Learning function that works is passive defense against active >cooked lines of opponents ! >I have nothing against this. >But putting a mass of deep lines in a book that were produced at home >with autoplaying against the commercial enemy-versions is nothing >passive. >This is an attack and increases the tug-of-war. > >>is not the point, we were talking about cooked lines. In reaction on a >>posting by Thorsten, who found out in a game MCP versus Hiarcs that >>MCP played 37 moves of 'theory' and left the book with a +4 score. >> >>THAT is a development I dislike. > >Right. I know that the learning function of Mchess6 was not that >brilliant. >So what shall i have in marty programming a better one in mchess7. >But the cooked lines are the problem. > > >> >>Regards, Jeroen
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.