Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 01:36:36 10/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 10:32:03, Robert Hyatt wrote: >The question would have to be "how often does that happen?" I don't see it >often enough to be able to cite a single game. The question has to be, which >is more prone to errors. I would say sacrificing pieces for mythical advantages >is more dangerous than the case where you think you win a piece but don't, >because the former will happen far more often, IMHO of course. The case might be dangerous, but whole life is dangerous. Chess is a game. You can risk the danger. Or as your famous president said: "Some men see things and say way, i dream things that never were and say: WHY NOT ?!" >I have a lot of speculative stuff myself. Two passed pawns on the 6th are >one, and until I got this tuned right, I lost lots of games because I would >sac a piece to get the passed pawns, but they could be stopped/blockaded/won >beyond the search horizon... you have to lose more game until you get it tuned right i would assume. losing is for learning bob.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.