Author: Francesco Di Tolla
Date: 02:33:35 10/19/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2000 at 22:35:43, Robert Hyatt wrote: >I totally disagree here. The purpose of a "standard" is _not_ "flexibility". >It is preciseness. Yes but a bad standard remains a bad standard: pgn is a bad standard brecause it requires a lot of stupid things. E.g.: why on earth the line of the text should be fixed? I see only good reasons for not fixing it. Than the handling of variations and comments is not specified properly. I think we need a better standard and I hope it will be an XML-based one. regards Franz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.