Author: Ferdinand S. Mosca
Date: 06:52:21 10/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2000 at 09:10:48, Chessfun wrote: >On October 20, 2000 at 09:03:55, Ferdinand S. Mosca wrote: > >>On October 19, 2000 at 11:02:25, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>Have there been any such tests? >>>If not, does anyone have an educated guess? >>>S.Taylor >> >>Not at this time for Gambit Tiger!! >>It's not at all very hard to predict the outcome, Shredder is better. > > >Why do you make such a statement when you have not even played a single >game with Gambit?? nor Shredder 5 AFAIK. Are you sure? Both engines are good, but Shredder has an advantage. You know for sure what's the strogest side of Shredder. Well have you analyzed the game of both engines? With less current data to base, how would you like to predict the outcome then? Don't forget your history, it's very important. > > >>Just look at the record of Shredder, besides Shredder is more stable. > > >More stable?? It may have a good record but really to make a statement >such as this when you know nothing of Gambit is a bit silly IMHO. Gambit Tiger is from Chess Tiger!, Shredder is from Shredder!! I believe both engines have progressed. Can you quantify? Gambit Tiger still needs time!! But I tend to like the style of Gambit Tiger. Just a suggestion, don't delete the whole previous message, some ideas might not be understood. > > >I myself know nothing of Shredder 5 but I do know it better be much better >than Shredder 4 if it is to beat Gambit. > > >>The Gambit Tiger still needs time to really reach its peak. > > >Another statement out of nothing. > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.