Author: Chessfun
Date: 07:11:17 10/20/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2000 at 09:52:21, Ferdinand S. Mosca wrote: >On October 20, 2000 at 09:10:48, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 20, 2000 at 09:03:55, Ferdinand S. Mosca wrote: >> >>>On October 19, 2000 at 11:02:25, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>Have there been any such tests? >>>>If not, does anyone have an educated guess? >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>Not at this time for Gambit Tiger!! >>>It's not at all very hard to predict the outcome, Shredder is better. >> >> >>Why do you make such a statement when you have not even played a single >>game with Gambit?? nor Shredder 5 AFAIK. > >Are you sure? I said AFAIK if your saying different then say it, don't speak in riddles. >Both engines are good, but Shredder has an advantage. You know for sure >what's the strogest side of Shredder. What advantage? as I said above either say you have used both or admit you haven't but don't make qualified statements unless you have used them BOTH. >Well have you analyzed the game of both engines? With less current data to base, >how would you like to predict the outcome then? Don't forget your history, it's >very important. I am certainly not predicting the outcome. And have no interest in doing so. I am just wondering why you are if you haven't used both?.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.