Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:59:43 10/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2000 at 15:01:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 22, 2000 at 14:41:57, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: > >>Congrats to Roland, too. Great performance shown by Patzer. >> >>Uli > >Patzer result would have been better if it was capable of using the Dual >processors from the beginning. I understand that patzer had problem in the >settings for which it was unable to recognize both processors. > >Pichard. We do not know that the result could be better. I understood that the problem was that it could not use the 2 proccesors in the permanent brain and later the programmer fixed this problem but created another problem when patzer could not use the 2 proccesors when it played and could use it only in the permanent brain. I guess that the difference from these problem is only about 30 elo and it means that the expected difference in the result is something like 0.4125 points out of 11. 0.4125 is an average number and the number can be also 0 points. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.