Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:48:56 10/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2000 at 16:24:58, Frank Quisinsky wrote: >On October 22, 2000 at 15:59:43, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 22, 2000 at 15:01:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On October 22, 2000 at 14:41:57, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>> >>>>Congrats to Roland, too. Great performance shown by Patzer. >>>> >>>>Uli >>> >>>Patzer result would have been better if it was capable of using the Dual >>>processors from the beginning. I understand that patzer had problem in the >>>settings for which it was unable to recognize both processors. >>> >>>Pichard. >> >>We do not know that the result could be better. >> >>I understood that the problem was that it could not use the 2 proccesors in the >>permanent brain and later the programmer fixed this problem but created another >>problem when patzer could not use the 2 proccesors when it played and could use >>it only in the permanent brain. >> >>I guess that the difference from these problem is only about 30 elo and it means >>that the expected difference in the result is something like 0.4125 points out >>of 11. >> >>0.4125 is an average number and the number can be also 0 points. >> >>Uri > >Hello, > >I come for minutes at home :-) > >Yes this is right Uri ! >Roland played round 8-11 with the version from last weekend. Here 2 processor in >normal mode and 1 processor in permanent brain. I think also that this is not >very important. > >Only in round 7 against Chess Tiger this big problem from Patzer. Furthermore I >forget to added the 5-piece directory in the configuration set variable from >Patzer. Patzer played against Tiger with 4-piece nalimov TBs. I think very big >luck for Chess Tiger. Can Patzer find something better with the 5-piece tablebases? I think the endgame was equal and patzer could not win tiger with the 5 piece tablebase but I may be wrong. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.