Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:07:54 10/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2000 at 16:16:19, Bas Hamstra wrote: >On October 21, 2000 at 14:30:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>Don't kill me - i am only joking ! Please don't start another >>ideology battle :-))) here. >> >>Seems Gambit-Tiger plays not the weakest games... > >Well, maybe I exaggerated slightly when I said GT plays boring. But speculative >eval is ANYTHING but a new paradigm. > >Only a pity that it thinks it needs killerlines in a tournament against >amateurs. I mean bookmoves that are NO theory. I mean the continuation of >unplayable moves, until it's basically mate in 10. See Tiger-Tao. The book moves in Tiger-Tao are theory moves. I looked in an old book like f5book.ctg and there are 2 replies for 12.exd5(Qa5 and Bg7) Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.