Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:13:16 10/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2000 at 17:06:17, Ratko V Tomic wrote: >> 1)I believe that the difference between Gambittiger and the default version of >> tiger is the fact that Gambit has bigger positional scores. > >That wouldn't account for having two separate programs and the intent Christophe >mentioned to unify the two in the future and get the best of both worlds. If it >were just evaluation terms and weights one could just have a single program with >changed settings (using the union of all the evaluation terms in the two Tigers, >then if the setting "i" has weight(i)=0 don't evaluate term T(i)). It must be a >greater difference than just tweaking the weights of various evaluation terms. >And if were that simple everyone would tweak their's, too, but apparently that >alone doesn't work very well (as Bob can tell you). I do not say that the only difference is numbers but my understanding from previous posts is that the difference is simply the evaluation function and not new search rules. I did not say that it is a simple to do it. I only said that I do not call it a new paradigm. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.