Author: Frank Quisinsky
Date: 14:15:06 10/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2000 at 16:48:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 22, 2000 at 16:24:58, Frank Quisinsky wrote: > >>On October 22, 2000 at 15:59:43, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On October 22, 2000 at 15:01:28, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>On October 22, 2000 at 14:41:57, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >>>> >>>>>Congrats to Roland, too. Great performance shown by Patzer. >>>>> >>>>>Uli >>>> >>>>Patzer result would have been better if it was capable of using the Dual >>>>processors from the beginning. I understand that patzer had problem in the >>>>settings for which it was unable to recognize both processors. >>>> >>>>Pichard. >>> >>>We do not know that the result could be better. >>> >>>I understood that the problem was that it could not use the 2 proccesors in the >>>permanent brain and later the programmer fixed this problem but created another >>>problem when patzer could not use the 2 proccesors when it played and could use >>>it only in the permanent brain. >>> >>>I guess that the difference from these problem is only about 30 elo and it means >>>that the expected difference in the result is something like 0.4125 points out >>>of 11. >>> >>>0.4125 is an average number and the number can be also 0 points. >>> >>>Uri >> >>Hello, >> >>I come for minutes at home :-) >> >>Yes this is right Uri ! >>Roland played round 8-11 with the version from last weekend. Here 2 processor in >>normal mode and 1 processor in permanent brain. I think also that this is not >>very important. >> >>Only in round 7 against Chess Tiger this big problem from Patzer. Furthermore I >>forget to added the 5-piece directory in the configuration set variable from >>Patzer. Patzer played against Tiger with 4-piece nalimov TBs. I think very big >>luck for Chess Tiger. > >Can Patzer find something better with the 5-piece tablebases? > >I think the endgame was equal and patzer could not win tiger with the 5 piece >tablebase but I may be wrong. > >Uri Hi Uri, I have not made a analyses ! But Patzer stand a long time in this match better. The evaluation from Patzer is +2.0 and Tiger -0.8 - -1.2. In the endgame is in my opinion the position remis. Best Frank
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.