Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: What Gambit New Paradigm could be...if it exist

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 01:22:00 10/23/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 22, 2000 at 17:09:25, Bas Hamstra wrote:
>I agree. Now you can do the some for king safety. For instance, you can assign a
>huge bonus when two or more pieces are very close to the enemy king. I have
>tried this earlier: score is proportional to the distance of a piece to the
>enemy king. And proportional to piecevalue of the attacking piece. Now you will
>sack severely to get several heavy pieces VERY close to the enemy king. Even if
>you don't know the outcome. With some tuning you will gamble right most of the
>time. I believe that is what GT is doing.
>
>
>Bas.

to speak in bean-counter terms: this is brilliant. if this makes the programs
stronger, if this gets better results, others can and will easily follow,
or ?!




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.