Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: What Gambit New Paradigm could be...if it exist

Author: Thorsten Czub

Date: 06:51:53 10/23/00

Go up one level in this thread

On October 23, 2000 at 07:21:20, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>Yes,
>correct.
>Simple
>complicated
>still simple.


>objection
>ludicrous
>boloney
>no basis
>real world.

>flawed comparison

>Gambit Tiger
>appears
>strongest program
>moment.
>No problem
>religious rhetoric
>minimum.
>Fortunately
>very few
>believe
>a word
>TC utters
>trusts results instead.
>Good
>idea IMHO.

>Correct
>just calculation
>changed parameters.

>very well
>correct way
>No.

>Mogens.


Have you ever seen Monthy Python, especially John Cleese ?!

• Re: What Gambit New Paradigm could be...if it exist Mogens Larsen 09:48:58 10/23/00
  • Re: What Gambit New Paradigm could be...if it exist Thorsten Czub 10:47:50 10/23/00

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.