Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:05:23 10/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2000 at 05:58:36, Harald Faber wrote: >>funny - isn`t it ? >The only funny thing is that you always write as if this playing style is Chris' >own which he invented, as if it is not possible to get a program attack without >"his" ideas. it IS possible. of course. and we all know these programs for a long time. but chris ideas to write a strong attacking program have been laughed about: "such a strategy is only good for at least getting 50% of the points !" "it works in half of the games, and in the other half it sucks." too risky, better accurate. i know all these answers... >Do all attacking chess players follow Andersens or Morphys ideas? no. >I don't think so. Every chess player who does not know of Morphy e.g. but likes >to and plays attacking chess does not follow his "ideas". Get it? i get it harald. the difference is that YOU can i and all others here in this group KNOW CSTAL and Chris ideas (= Morphys ideas, if you want to stay in this image...). >Attacking chess is not invented by Chris. no. not invented by chris. but he implemented it in cstal. cstal tries to create attacks. or ?!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.