Author: Harald Faber
Date: 08:02:35 10/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2000 at 10:05:23, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 23, 2000 at 05:58:36, Harald Faber wrote: >>>funny - isn`t it ? > >>The only funny thing is that you always write as if this playing style is Chris' >>own which he invented, as if it is not possible to get a program attack without >>"his" ideas. > >it IS possible. of course. and we all know these programs for a long time. >but chris ideas to write a strong attacking program have been laughed about: >"such a strategy is only good for at least getting 50% of the points !" >"it works in half of the games, and in the other half it sucks." >too risky, better accurate. i know all these answers... Tal does not only attack, Tal sacs. Too often. Often not justified. I think that's what most people wanted to say. Not that attacking does not work.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.