Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 14:30:50 10/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2000 at 17:04:20, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 23, 2000 at 15:01:07, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>[Event "?"] >>[Site "USA"] >>[Date "1989.??.??"] >>[Round "2"] >>[White "Deep Thought"] >>[Black "Valvo Michael J"] >>[Result "0-1"] >>[ECO "C31"] >> >>1. e4 e5 2. f4 d5 3. exd5 c6 4. Nc3 exf4 5. Nf3 Bd6 6. d4 Ne7 7. >>dxc6 Nbxc6 8. d5 Nb4 9. Bc4 0-0 10. a3 b5 11. Bb3 Na6 12. Nxb5 Qa5+ >>13. Nc3 Nc5 14. Ba2 Ba6 15. b4 Qc7 16. bxc5 Rfe8 17. Ne2 Qxc5 18. c4 >>Nxd5 19. Qd4 Qxd4 20. Nxd4 Bc5 21. Kd2 Ne3 22. Kc3 Rac8 23. Bb2 Nxg2 >>24. Raf1 Rcd8 25. Rhg1 Re3+ 26. Kd2 f3 27. Rxf3 Rxf3 28. Rxg2 Rh3 >>29. Kc1 g6 30. a4 Bb7 31. Rf2 Ba8 32. Bb1 Rb8 33. Ba2 Rd3 34. Rf4 >>Rd2 35. Kxd2 Rxb2+ 36. Nc2 Rxa2 37. Nc3 Rb2 38. Rf6 Kg7 39. Rf1 f5 >>40. Nd5 Bxd5 41. cxd5 Rb3 42. h4 Kf6 43. Re1 Rh3 44. Re6+ Kf7 45. a5 >>Rxh4 46. Rc6 Bb4+ 47. Nxb4 Rxb4 48. Rc7+ Kf6 >>0-1 >> >>[D]r4rk1/p1q1nppp/b2b4/2nP4/1P3p2/P1N2N2/B1P3PP/R1BQK2R w - - >> >>This position is at white's 16th move. bxc5 leads to nastiness for white, but >>is there a better move? Perhaps 16. b5!?, preventing black's light-squared >>bishop from pointing at f1 temporarily. Or perhaps an immediate Ne2 would be a >>little better, with the idea of castling to get the king to a safer place. >>I'm especially interested to know what Gambit-Tiger sees here - does it see the >>attack coming? >> >>Thanks, >>Jeremiah > > >I think most any program will figure out pretty quickly that white is going >to have some problems here. Crafty starts off at +3, but gets down to +2 >very quickly as it understands not castling. The eval steadily drops iteration >by iteration. > >Of course, it would _still_ play the move... By the 5 min mark on my quad xeon, it is down to just over +1.3...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.