Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 16:49:26 10/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2000 at 19:26:17, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>One small leap for Thorsten, one giant stretch for mankind :o)). > >i am sure you will find ways to make the people forget about your attempt >to throw mud on unguilty people, just because you did not like the facts >these people presented. its not up to you to decide what is fact and what is >fantasy, what is objective and what is subjective. Just a small correction. It wasn't the facts, it was the presentation and the inability to suppress their ignorance as demonstrated by certain individuals. >you did it other way arround. very fine. its your decision. Nope. You don't need to study any program to dismiss your "ideas". >but don't speculate that this will be forgotten too soon. >gandalf plans. cstal plans. and gambit-tiger plans. all 3 mate-attacks. Nope. You can't equate attacking and planning. I've already explained it once before in a previous message. Read again if there's something you don't understand. There's also a couple of excellent explanations provided by Uri. So recharge you thinking hat, recalibrate your eyesight and good luck. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.