Author: Howard Exner
Date: 21:53:05 10/23/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 23, 2000 at 22:06:13, Chessfun wrote: >On October 23, 2000 at 20:46:08, Jeremiah Penery wrote: > >>On October 23, 2000 at 19:44:15, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 23, 2000 at 15:01:07, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>>>[D]r4rk1/p1q1nppp/b2b4/2nP4/1P3p2/P1N2N2/B1P3PP/R1BQK2R w - - >> >> >>>Gambit 1.0 Cel 433 48 mb. >>>; 00:00:00.6 1. Score: 4.06 depth: 7 bxc5 Bxc5 Ne4 Rae8 c4 Nc6 Nd2 >>>; 00:00:00.3 1. Score: 4.06 depth: 7 bxc5 Bxc5 Ne4 Rae8 d6 Qc6 Nxc5 Nd5+ >>>Kd2 Qxc5 >>>; 00:00:02.1 1. Score: 3.70 depth: 8 bxc5 Rfe8 Ne4 Nf5 Ng5 Bxc5 Qg4 Qe5 >>>; 00:00:08.1 1. Score: 3.40 depth: 9 bxc5 Bxc5 Ne4 Nf5 c4 Rfe8 Qe2 Ne3 Nfg5 >>>Bd4 >>>; 00:00:25.9 1. Score: 3.00 depth: 10 bxc5 Rfe8 Ne4 Nf5 Ng5 Bxc5 c4 Bd4 d6 >>>Qxd6 >>>; 00:00:44.2 1. Score: 2.96 depth: 11 bxc5 Rfe8 Ne4 Nf5 Ng5 Bxc5 d6 Nxd6 >>>Bd5 Nxe4 Bxe4 >>>; 00:04:53.4 1. Score: 1.64 depth: 12 bxc5 Rae8 Ne2 Nxd5 c4 Nc3 cxd6 Qc5 d7 >>>Rxe2+ Qxe2 Nxe2 Kxe2 Bxc4+ Bxc4 Qxc4+ >>>; 00:07:21.9 1. Score: 1.64 depth: 13 bxc5 Rae8 Ne2 Nxd5 c4 Nc3 cxd6 Qc5 d7 >>>Rxe2+ Qxe2 Nxe2 Kxe2 Bxc4+ Bxc4 Qxc4+ >>>; 00:17:02.6 1. Score: 1.42 depth: 14 bxc5 Rfe8 Ne2 Qxc5 c4 Nxd5 Qc2 Rac8 >>>Rf1 Bxc4 Bxc4 Qxc4 Qxc4 Rxc4 >> >>Thanks for the output Sarah. :) >> >>I'm somewhat disappointed that GT shows such a high score for white here, and >>I'm interested to know if you make the move bxc5 what it will see for black. >> >>Jeremiah > > >I'm not. I doubt many programs could resist bxc5 though admit I have >not checked any others. > >I think more important are the moves in the line posted as they follow >the game score after bxc5. >16. bxc5 Rfe8 17. Ne2 Qxc5 18. c4 Nxd5 After this which is the >line Gambit originally posts. Gambit now evals the following this >also follows the game 19. Qd4 Qxd4 20. Nxd4 Bc5 > >Now in the game played was; >21. Kd2 Gambit prefers Kd1 and after 21...Ne3+ posts; > >22. Bxe3 Rxe3 23. Nc2 Rd8+ 24. Ke1 Re6 25. Rd1 Rde8 26. Rd2 Bb7 >27. Rf1 g5 28. Rf2 Bxf2 29. Kxf2 f5 30. g3 Re4 >which it evals as +0.58 Depth 15. > >In the line 21. Kd2 if forced it follows; >21. Kd2 Ne3 22. Kc3 Rac8 23. Now Nxf4 instead of Bb2 23....Bxd4+ >24. Kxd4 Nc2+ 25. Kc3 Nxa1 evals as; > >26. Kb2 Bxc4 27. Bxc4 Rxc4 28. Kxa1 f6 29. g3 Rd8 30. Re1 Rc2 >31. h3 Rb8 32. Nd5 Rb3 33. Re8+ Kf7 34. Re7+ Kf8 >+0.60 Depth 15. > >Sarah. It would be nice if Mike Valvo had some analysis of this game. He might have some lines where white could have improved after bxc5. But even if white mis-stepped in the ensuing play, clearly the play of Valvo was excellent as he maximized the force of his pieces until Deep Thought cracked.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.