Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:49:06 10/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2000 at 10:41:44, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 24, 2000 at 09:58:16, Jorge wrote: > >>Did Kasparov find weaknesses in Deep Blue at the time? (Any program, right?) > >Did you look at the games? >Kasparov found a lot of weaknesses in Deep blue. > >The problem is that kasaprov has also a lot of weaknesses. > > >>That's not necessarily true, but even real good players have some degree of >>difficulty finding weaknesses in today's top programs. > > >It is very easy to see weaknesses in today top programs. > > With sharp book >>openings, Learning, and so on for optimal strength, it is getting more difficult >>to beat these monster programs. > >Playing regular games against them is a very bad idea if you try to find >weaknesses. > >It is easy to compose positions that they do not understand and every 1500 >player understands. > >I believe that I can beat everyone of them 2:0 if you let me to choose the >initial position that I will compose. > >I agree to play both sides of the same position so without weaknesses they can >get at least 1:1. > >Uri If you are interested only in weaknesses in playing then it is easy also to find them without being a good player. You only need to do some comp-comp games between the programs that you think that they have no weaknesses. The fact that you do not get the same result for all the games is a clear proof that they have weaknesses. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.