Author: James T. Walker
Date: 11:36:21 10/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2000 at 14:28:33, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 24, 2000 at 14:16:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 24, 2000 at 14:05:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >> >>>24.Ng5+! Kh8 25.Qf5 h4 26.h3 Qxa2 27.Re6 Kg8 28.Kg2 Re8 29.Rxe8+ Nxe8 >>> = (-0.09) Depth: 10/28 00:00:10 5316kN >>> +- (2.41) Depth: 17/43 00:32:30 1055928kN >>> >>>00:28:28.9 2,36 15 369013027 Ng5+ Kh8 Qf5 h4 h3 Qxa2 Re7 Qa3 Rf7 Kg8 Kg2 Qc5 >>>Rxf6 Qxf5 Rxf5 Rf8 Rxf8+ Kxf8 >>> >> >>Bad points for all the GM's and IM's that are claiming 23. .. h5! >>holds ;) >> >>-- >>GCP >I guess that it is also a bad point for most programs that probably claim at >tournament time control that h5 holds and cannot find the previous Qe6 because >of this reason. > >I guess that gambittiger is better because of better king safety evaluation in >this case. > >Uri Well to me the question is if h5? does not hold then what does? Just because h5 does not save the game does not mean it's not the best try. There may be no save at this point. Jim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.