Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 12:04:19 10/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2000 at 14:06:28, Thorsten Czub wrote: >you achieve ANYTHING mogens. you are a genius. and a genius achieves all we can >give to him. Thanks. >of course mogens. they ask me how their programs play, i tell them about, >and from time to time this helps to make a champion. or to win a tournament. >the trick is to know in forward who will gonna make it :-)) Your comments have undoubtedly had a great impact. Who can live without knowing the style of play of your own program and hidden features. Nothing so far has convinced me about your analytical skills. There hasn't been anything in your messages so far to reveal anything extraordinary. My chess analytical skills are very limited. I have no problems admitting that. Fortunately this means that I can recognize others with the same lack of knowledge, eg. you. Takes one to know one as the saying goes. >some do even not believe when i tell them how strong their latest versions >are. but most often i am capable to convince them (you know what i mean: >religion !!) I'm sure they are quite clueless about all the features you add all by yourself. If someone told me that my program was capable of planning, I would be astonished too. Unfortunately, it isn't correct just the same. This explains why cheerleaders are so popular I guess. >with others it is hard work. but over all it makes fun. and you learn >a lot about people, chess and also about people like you. because you >share something, you become normally friends. friendship is IMO nothing >negative. is it for you ? Of course not, that would be in contrast to the definition of friendship. Something just as important is honesty and integrity. IMO you lack both, but that's just my opinion. I have a hunch you disagree :o). >a good prophet is a fast prophet, mogens. a bad prophet is often mistaken. >thats easy. In this case the fast prophet is an inaccurate one as far as I, and most likely a few other, can tell. >it looks you are very wise mogens. Thanks again. It comes naturally :o)). >please come back later when you have something to say that has in fact >ONE chess move in it. or has at least something to do with chess. If you followed your own advice then we wouldn't be having this discussion. Allowing you to spread falsehood would just encourage everyone else, which is why I bother posting replies. But don't worry, I'll leave you alone for now. >why not trying with a game of gandalf for the beginning. I have several very nice winning games with Gandalf. Some containing nice attacks, some with exquisite positional play and some caused by horrendous tactical blunders. Luckily, I'm smart enough not to post one or the other, claiming to see something that others can't. My advice to you would be to do the same. You probably won't, but the advice is good nonetheless. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.