Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 12:25:45 10/24/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2000 at 14:16:24, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 24, 2000 at 14:05:58, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>24.Ng5+! Kh8 25.Qf5 h4 26.h3 Qxa2 27.Re6 Kg8 28.Kg2 Re8 29.Rxe8+ Nxe8 >> = (-0.09) Depth: 10/28 00:00:10 5316kN >> +- (2.41) Depth: 17/43 00:32:30 1055928kN >> >>00:28:28.9 2,36 15 369013027 Ng5+ Kh8 Qf5 h4 h3 Qxa2 Re7 Qa3 Rf7 Kg8 Kg2 Qc5 >>Rxf6 Qxf5 Rxf5 Rf8 Rxf8+ Kxf8 >> > >Bad points for all the GM's and IM's that are claiming 23. .. h5! >holds ;) Yep. I also have the feeling that programs like Gambit and Deep Fritz would have played this game better than Kasparov, which shouldn't make sense under normal circumstances. Nxf6, for instance, and so on. "Normal" circumstances... How about a despicable thought: Did Kasparov include in the contract the right for a rematch in case of losing? I realize it is ugly speculation, but I have never seen Kasparov so weak, so hopeless, so unable to fight back. Enrique >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.