Author: Ricardo Gibert
Date: 16:35:41 10/25/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2000 at 18:25:26, Walter Koroljow wrote: >On October 24, 2000 at 21:32:37, James Robertson wrote: > >>On October 24, 2000 at 16:58:29, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>[D]1r4k1/p3QNpp/1p3n2/8/8/5P2/Pq3P1P/4R1K1 w - - 0 1 >>> >>> >>>I am interesting to know how much time do chess programs need to find Qe6 >>>that is probably a winning move because of the line Qe6 h5 Ng5+ Kh8 Qf5 and >>>black is in real trouble(for example Qxa2 Re7). >>> >>>Programs without the luck of being called gambit tiger may need many hours to >>>find Qe6 so please give them time. >>> >>>I am interested to know the score of programs that prefer a different move >>>because I am not sure in 100% that Qe6 is the only winning move. >>> >>>I am also not sure in 100% that the black is losing in the position that >>>kasparov resigned(I believe that black is losing but I think that the decision >>>to resign was too early and it is better to resign only if you sure that you are >>>losing and advantage of rook against a knight is not a good reason to resign >>>when there are queens on the board). >>> >>>Uri >> >>Insomniac 0.69a on my P933 requires almost 1'15'' to find Qe6. Interestingly, it >>expects Qe6 h6 Nxh6. >> >>James > >That is very interesting. Illescas gave 23...h6 a !! in his comments from team >Kramnik on Clubkasparov.com. Only in the variation with 21...Ra8 instead of 21...Rb8 is 23...h6 an effective move. > >Cheers, > >Walter BTW, the Illescas annotations to this game are very good.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.