Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:42:53 10/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2000 at 06:10:04, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >The final standings of the Debrecen-Tournament: > >1. Century 3 8,0 65.0 >2. FM Debreceni 7,5 61,5 >3. Nagy, Sandor 7,0 65,5 >4. SOS 6,5 65,0 >5. Nimzo 8 6,5 64,5 >6. Junior 5 6.0 63,5 >7. FM Menyhart 6,0 62,5 >8. Genius 5 5,5 61,0 >9. Shredder 4 5,5 59,0 >10.Chessm.7000 5,0 58,5 >11.Junior 6 5,0 57,0 >12.Fritz 6 4,5 59,0 >13.Kästner,Marcus 4,5 57,0 >14.Szabo, Zsolt 4,0 55,0 >15.Hiarcs 7.32 3,5 57,0 >16.Genius 6.5 3,0 57,0 > >More infos and comments in german/english on the chessbits-site > >http://mitglied.tripod.de/ChessBits/index.html What was the hardware of the participants(including the humans who used programs to help them)? It is surprising that the advanced players failed to win the competition. This leads to the following question What is the expected result of advanced players against programs(time control 2 hours per game)? It seems that there is no big difference even in cases that the players are FM's. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.