Author: Marcus Kaestner
Date: 05:56:40 10/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
>What was the hardware of the participants(including the humans who used twohave had pIII-800 (century, genius 5), all others celeron 566. all with 128 mb. so the hardware-difference was not so big. >programs >to help them)? the advanced players: the fm has had a dual-pentium 466 and a celeron 566, nagy has had a PIII-800, i have had a dual-celeron 566, szabo a celeron 566 > >It is surprising that the advanced players failed to win the competition. yes, but century was too strong. if century would bot have compete, they would have won. > >This leads to the following question >What is the expected result of advanced players against programs(time control 2 >hours per game)? i do not know. but they are very difficult to beat. >It seems that there is no big difference even in cases that the players are >FM's. more important is how experienced you are in advanced-playing. i started with no experience and 1 out of 7 making many "handling-mistakes" at the end i was much more experienced, making 3,5 out of four. marcus > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.