Author: Bas Hamstra
Date: 11:44:35 10/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2000 at 11:29:07, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On October 21, 2000 at 17:57:25, Chessfun wrote: > >Hi Sarah, > > >>>[Event "Open Dutch CC 2000"] >>>[Site "Leiden NED"] >>>[Date "2000.10.21"] >>>[Round "08"] >>>[White "Chess Tiger"] >>>[Black "Tao"] >>>[Result "1-0"] >>> >>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 >>>8.cxd3 Nd4 9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.dxe4 cxd5 12.exd5 Nc2+ 13.Kd1 Nxa1 >>>14.Qd4 Rg8 15.d6 Bxd6 16.Qxd6 Qe7 17.Qd5 Rf8 18.Bb5 Nc2 19.Kxc2 a6 >>>20.Ne6 f4 21.Re1 Rf5 22.Nc7+ Kf8 23.Rxe7 Rxd5 24.Nxd5 axb5 25.Bxf4 g5 1-0 >> >>What book is this Gambit is using? why does it play 3. Nc3? > >Of course I use special books for tournaments like this. Against Tao I chose the >Belgrade gambit, because I knew that Tao had a small book. After 5 Nd5 Tao was >out of book and already then I predicted that it would swallow the rook at a1. > >Regards, Jeroen It only knows what it has played on the Internet, it just adds it all. I am not unsatisfied with it, on the whole. In principle it won't fall twice for the same bad line. The game against Tiger was not directly a book error, in the sense that the book chose a bad move. There was one real book error against Morphy, where a bookmove lost a pawn right away. But on the whole I am not unsatisfied with the openingplay, considering the book is 150k and costed me zero work. It's main pupose is allowing the king to castle and not eating bad gambit pawns :-) Ciao, Bas.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.