Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 14:24:45 10/26/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2000 at 19:21:56, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On October 25, 2000 at 19:10:12, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On October 25, 2000 at 18:28:03, Stephen Ham wrote: >> >>>Dear Jorge, >>> >>>I've been playing 2 correspondence games apiece against both Fritz 6a and Nimzo >>>7.32. See the Campbell Report at the Correspondence Chess.com site for these >>>games. As such, the chess engines were mated to a Pentium III 500 computer and >>>allowed to compute for 17-22 hours per move. >>> >>>My perceptions were that Nimzo 7.32 was the superior tactician while I sensed >>>that Fritz 6a had greater technical skills. In short, Fritz seemed "smarter" >>>than Nimzo, but Nimzo was the better tactician...it's certainly naturally more >>>agressive. However Nimzo 7.32's clear weakness was in static positions. This is >>>in stark contrast to what you wrote, so perhaps the perceived difference is due >>>to the extended time given the chess engines to operate, versus OTB time >>>control. >>> >>>All the best, >>> >>>Stephen Ham >> >>I just read your comments of your historic match against both engines in >>correspondence time control. I believe that Dr. Chrilly Donninger has improved >>his latest version of Nimzo 8 in static positions, if not there is still time to >>improve it. For others interested in reading your analysis, simply click here: >> >>http://correspondencechess.com/campbell/ham/ham.htm > >For players rated over 2400 which program do you recommend. I believe that Rebel Century and Nimzo 8 are the strongest opponent for Humans rated over 2400 in Standard time control at this moment. http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?135005 >>Pichard.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.