Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:22:51 10/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2000 at 11:07:36, pavel wrote: >On October 27, 2000 at 11:00:39, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On October 27, 2000 at 10:57:51, pavel wrote: >> >>>On October 27, 2000 at 10:47:57, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>> >>>>On October 27, 2000 at 09:45:20, pavel wrote: >>>> >>>>>so long for being better than fritz6........ >>>> >>>>I don't think anyone claimed that............ >>>> >>>>Mogens. >>> >>>uhu! >>> >>>they did, several beta-testers. >>>including the one I meet in chess.net, he was a beta tester for chessbase but >>>still he said, for sure, that gandalf was better than fritz6a. >>> >>>I belive I saw Frank Q saying (or rather typing it) it, >>>and several others, can't remember who. >>> >>>Pavel :) >> >>Frank is not very objective concerning new/amateur engines... > >but it is under this statement "gandalf is better than fritz6" that several >people has started long-time control games between gandalf and fritz6. > >they could have tried any thing else, why fritz6? only because of the above >statement. > >so mogens..yes poeple did say that ;) > >Pavel Gandalf suffered from a learning bug and lost the same opening twice against Junior because the learning is destroyed. I believe that the same happened against other programs. I think that the real ssdf rating of gandalf should be better because the bug was corrected and I understood that the bug appears only when you stop games played by the autoplayer and is not relevant for the customer. I do not say that it is better than Fritz6a but I believe that it is better than the rating that it got. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.