Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 09:35:28 10/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2000 at 12:23:35, Marcus Kaestner wrote: >>Gandalf suffered from a learning bug and lost the same opening twice against >>Junior because the learning is destroyed. >>I believe that the same happened against other programs. >> >>I think that the real ssdf rating of gandalf should be better because the bug >>was corrected and I understood that the bug appears only when you stop games >>played by the autoplayer and is not relevant for the customer. >> >>I do not say that it is better than Fritz6a but I believe that it is better than >>the rating that it got. > > >more important: gandalf wins very much from fast computers. ALL the testers i >know have the same results: on a 1 ghz machine with game in one hour, gandalf is >slightly behind fritz6a. The 40:2 of the SSDF on AMD 450s is slower than Game/60 on a 1 Ghz machine, and their rating for Gandalf was much lower than "slightly behind F6a." Enrique > on tournament level (3h/game) on the same machine >gandalf is better than f6a. > >so you need a very fast computer or a long time control for really great >gandalf-results. if you compare the ssdf-results with the hardware they use, the >result fits. > >but give gandalf a faster machine and you can see how it turns... > >marcus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.