Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:43:59 10/27/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2000 at 12:35:28, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On October 27, 2000 at 12:23:35, Marcus Kaestner wrote: > >>>Gandalf suffered from a learning bug and lost the same opening twice against >>>Junior because the learning is destroyed. >>>I believe that the same happened against other programs. >>> >>>I think that the real ssdf rating of gandalf should be better because the bug >>>was corrected and I understood that the bug appears only when you stop games >>>played by the autoplayer and is not relevant for the customer. >>> >>>I do not say that it is better than Fritz6a but I believe that it is better than >>>the rating that it got. >> >> >>more important: gandalf wins very much from fast computers. ALL the testers i >>know have the same results: on a 1 ghz machine with game in one hour, gandalf is >>slightly behind fritz6a. > >The 40:2 of the SSDF on AMD 450s is slower than Game/60 on a 1 Ghz machine, and >their rating for Gandalf was much lower than "slightly behind F6a." > >Enrique Their results are not convincing because gandalf suffered from a learning bug. I am interested to know the rating if you do not include losses of gandalf because of the learning bug. It is possible that it is only slightly behind F6a without the learning bug. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.